“I can’t do anything! FU**!”

“I can’t do anything! FU**!”…’Monumental error’ Liverpool goal canceled, what the hell happened?

“There’s nothing I can do. FU**!”

What the hell happened in the video assistant referee (VAR) room that cost Liverpool a goal has been revealed.

“The Professional Match Officials’ Organization of England (PGMOL) has released the full audio recording from the VAR room relating to the disallowed goal by Luis Diaz in Saturday’s match between Tottenham Hotspur and Liverpool,” the Premier League (PL) official website said on Thursday.

The incident dates back to last weekend. Liverpool lost 1-2 away to Tottenham in the seventh round of the 2023-2024 EPL on Saturday at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London, England.

The Reds were sent off twice. Liverpool pressed hard up front and harassed Tottenham early on, but their plans were disrupted in the 26th minute when Curtis Jones was sent off. Jones slipped as he tried to win the ball and tackled Yves Bissouma hard into the shin area. The referee pulled out a red card after a video assistant referee (VAR) review.

It wasn’t the end of the story. Liverpool brought on Diogo Jota after Cody Gakpo complained of pain at the start of the second half, but Jota was sent off for a second yellow card in the 24th minute with the score tied at 1-1. Playing with nine men for over 20 minutes, Liverpool went down to their knees at 1-2, with Joel Matip’s unfortunate own goal just before the end of the match.

To add insult to injury, the Reds had a goal disallowed. In the 34th minute, Dias found the back of the net after slipping behind the Tottenham defense. It looked as if Liverpool would take the lead in red territory, but after VAR, the goal was ruled offside.

However, this turned out to be a mistake due to a miscommunication between the video assistant referee and the referee. The VAR room thought the referee had awarded the goal and told them it was confirmed, but it was actually offside. After being robbed of a legitimate lead, Liverpool manager Jürgen Klopp reacted angrily after the game, saying “I’ve never seen a game played in such unfair conditions” and “it was a crazy call.”

After the game, PGMOL was quick to acknowledge the error. “The referee made a major mistake in the first half,” PGMOL said. “The referee made a major mistake in the first half when he disallowed Diaz’s goal, but the VAR should have stepped in and awarded the goal, and it was a clear mistake not to do so. We will fully review the process by which this decision was made.”

Liverpool followed suit with an official statement. “Last night PGMOL admitted they got it wrong. It is clear that the fairness of the sport has been compromised by a failure to apply the rules of the game correctly.” “We fully understand the pressure that referees are under, but this pressure should be alleviated by the existence and implementation of VAR. It should not be exacerbated.”

He also called for measures to be put in place. “It is unsatisfactory that we were not given enough time to make the right decision and that there was no follow-up intervention,” Liverpool said, “It is also unacceptable that this failure has already been labeled as a ‘significant human error’. “It is also unacceptable that this failure has already been labeled a ‘significant human error’. This is essential for the reliability of future decisions. This is because the lessons learned can be used to improve processes and be applied to all clubs. We must ensure that this situation never happens again.”

Of course, there was no way to change the outcome. A replay or a draw is not an option. For now, PGMOL has excluded referees Darren England and Dan Cook, the VARs for the Tottenham and Liverpool games, from the next match. England was scheduled to be the fourth official for the Nottingham Forest and Brentford games, and Cook was scheduled to be the assistant referee for the Fulham and Chelsea games, but both were replaced.

Unsurprisingly, the controversy did not die down easily. CNN in the US called it a “monumental error”. Eventually, the PGMOL even released a recording of the incident. It shows the entire conversation between the assistant referee, the referee, the VAR, and the replay room officials. Liverpool have reportedly already received and reviewed the recording.

The revelations are shocking. The referee and assistant referee initially called Díaz offside after his shot crossed the line. They then communicated with the VAR room to double-check.

The VAR immediately communicated with the replay room and looked at several angles. The result was a line drawn precisely to the foot of Tottenham’s final defender, Cristian Romero, and confirmed that he was onside. “Checked. Perfect,” he shouted.

And just like that, play resumed. Not from a kickoff after Tottenham’s goal, but from a free kick. Then the replay room said, “No, wait, wait, wait. The original call was offside, is this correct?” and realized the error. The assistant referee VAR (AVAR) said, “That’s right. Offside,” and then realized the problem and said, “Wait a minute, that’s wrong,” in surprise.

But the play had already been rushed. Realizing the mistake, the VAR referee, England, let out an expletive, but there was nothing he could do.

The replay room relayed the PGMOL representative’s call to stop play, but the VAR was frustrated, saying, “There’s nothing we can do now.” The replay room again asked for the match to be stopped, but was told “The match has already been restarted. We can’t do anything about it” and profanity were repeated.

In releasing the recording, PGMOL said: “As we stated shortly after the final whistle on Saturday evening, we acknowledged that a significant human error occurred in the match. We acknowledged that the goal should have been ruled a goal through VAR intervention,” the organization reiterated.

PGMOL continued: “As with all scoring situations, the VAR team checked every aspect of the game. After the goal was disallowed for offside by the on-field officials, the checking steps and procedures were initiated and correctly carried out by the VAR. The moment of the kick was chosen correctly, and a precise 2D line was drawn to the feet of the defenders (including the goalkeeper) second behind.”

He also explained why the VARs did not stop play and award the goal. “The VAR team considered the possibility of stopping the game at that point, but the VAR referee and AVAR concluded that this was not permitted according to the protocol within the Laws of the Game, and therefore no intervention was possible,” PGMOL said.

“The offending VAR and AVAR have been removed from the schedule for the remainder of Round 7 and have been removed from the schedule for Round 8 this weekend,” PGMOL concluded. “In addition, PGMOL and the English Football Association (FA) have agreed to review the policy of having match officials independent of FIFA and UEFA to officiate at matches, 먹튀검증토토사이트 and have indicated that they will discuss how to prevent a recurrence.”

61 thoughts on ““I can’t do anything! FU**!”

  1. 프라그마틱 플레이의 슬롯 포트폴리오는 250개 이상의 게임으로 구성되어 있으며, 다양한 화폐와 33개 언어를 통해 전 세계 시장에 제공됩니다. 게이츠 오브 올림푸스, 더 도그 하우스, 존 헌터 앤 톰 오브 더 스캐럽 퀸, 스위트 보난자 등 다양한 테마의 슬롯을 즐겨보세요.
    프라그마틱 무료 슬롯

    프라그마틱은 늘 새로운 기술과 아이디어를 도입하죠. 이번에 어떤 혁신이 있었는지 알려주세요!

    http://copperprostate.site
    http://cialisrf.online
    https://jiangxiangtiyu.com/

  2. 프라그마틱과 관련된 내용 감사합니다! 또한, 제 사이트에서도 프라그마틱에 대한 정보를 찾아보실 수 있어요. 서로 이야기 공유하며 더 많은 지식을 얻어가요!
    프라그마틱슬롯

    프라그마틱은 늘 새로운 기술과 아이디어를 도입하죠. 이번에 어떤 혁신이 있었는지 알려주세요!

    https://www.blerifa.com
    https://www.antiquees.com
    https://www.utahppr.com

  3. 프라그마틱 슬롯에 대한 이해가 높아지네요! 제 사이트에서도 유용한 프라그마틱 정보를 찾아볼 수 있어요. 함께 공유하고 발전해봐요!
    프라그마틷

    프라그마틱 슬롯에 대한 이해가 높아지네요! 제 사이트에서도 유용한 프라그마틱 정보를 찾아볼 수 있어요. 함께 공유하고 발전해봐요!

    https://www.cialisforsale.site
    https://www.ahmethasimoglu.com
    https://www.btob-business.com

  4. 프라그마틱 게임은 선도적인 iGaming 콘텐츠 제공 업체로, 모바일 중심 다중 포트폴리오와 높은 품질의 엔터테인먼트를 자랑합니다. 우리는 슬롯, 라이브 카지노, 빙고 등 모든 제품에서 최고의 경험을 제공합니다.
    프라그마틱 게임

    프라그마틱은 늘 새로운 기술과 아이디어를 도입하죠. 이번에 어떤 혁신이 있었는지 알려주세요!

    https://www.googlikgid.site
    https://www.murayah.com
    https://www.academygohari.com

  5. 다양한 테마의 슬롯을 즐길 수 있는 250개 이상의 게임으로 구성된 프라그마틱 플레이의 슬롯 포트폴리오를 세계 시장에서 즐겨보세요.
    프라그마틱 게임

    프라그마틱 슬롯에 대한 이해가 높아지네요! 제 사이트에서도 유용한 프라그마틱 정보를 찾아볼 수 있어요. 함께 공유하고 발전해봐요!

    https://www.12315amd.cn/
    https://bidforfix.com/hot/
    https://hyunmee.net/hot/

  6. Understanding COSC Validation and Its Importance in Watchmaking
    COSC Certification and its Rigorous Standards
    COSC, or the Official Swiss Chronometer Testing Agency, is the official Switzerland testing agency that attests to the precision and precision of wristwatches. COSC certification is a mark of excellent craftsmanship and dependability in timekeeping. Not all watch brands follow COSC validation, such as Hublot, which instead follows to its own strict criteria with movements like the UNICO calibre, achieving similar precision.

    The Science of Exact Timekeeping
    The core system of a mechanized watch involves the mainspring, which provides energy as it unwinds. This system, however, can be susceptible to external factors that may impact its accuracy. COSC-accredited movements undergo rigorous testing—over 15 days in various circumstances (5 positions, 3 temperatures)—to ensure their durability and reliability. The tests assess:

    Typical daily rate precision between -4 and +6 seconds.
    Mean variation, maximum variation levels, and impacts of thermal variations.
    Why COSC Validation Is Important
    For timepiece fans and collectors, a COSC-accredited watch isn’t just a piece of tech but a testament to lasting quality and accuracy. It symbolizes a timepiece that:

    Presents exceptional reliability and precision.
    Provides guarantee of quality across the complete design of the timepiece.
    Is probable to hold its worth more efficiently, making it a sound investment.
    Famous Timepiece Brands
    Several famous manufacturers prioritize COSC certification for their watches, including Rolex, Omega, Breitling, and Longines, among others. Longines, for instance, presents collections like the Archive and Spirit, which feature COSC-certified mechanisms equipped with cutting-edge substances like silicone balance springs to boost resilience and performance.

    Historic Context and the Evolution of Timepieces
    The concept of the chronometer dates back to the requirement for exact chronometry for navigation at sea, emphasized by John Harrison’s work in the eighteenth cent. Since the formal foundation of COSC in 1973, the certification has become a standard for judging the precision of luxury timepieces, continuing a tradition of excellence in horology.

    Conclusion
    Owning a COSC-validated timepiece is more than an aesthetic selection; it’s a commitment to excellence and accuracy. For those valuing accuracy above all, the COSC validation offers peacefulness of mind, guaranteeing that each validated timepiece will operate dependably under various circumstances. Whether for personal satisfaction or as an investment decision, COSC-accredited watches distinguish themselves in the world of watchmaking, maintaining on a tradition of meticulous timekeeping.

  7. Understanding COSC Validation and Its Importance in Horology
    COSC Certification and its Stringent Criteria
    Controle Officiel Suisse des Chronometres, or the Controle Officiel Suisse des Chronometres, is the authorized Swiss testing agency that verifies the precision and precision of wristwatches. COSC certification is a symbol of superior craftsmanship and dependability in timekeeping. Not all timepiece brands pursue COSC validation, such as Hublot, which instead adheres to its own strict standards with mechanisms like the UNICO calibre, reaching comparable accuracy.

    The Science of Exact Timekeeping
    The core mechanism of a mechanical timepiece involves the mainspring, which supplies energy as it loosens. This mechanism, however, can be vulnerable to environmental factors that may affect its precision. COSC-accredited movements undergo rigorous testing—over fifteen days in various circumstances (5 positions, 3 temperatures)—to ensure their resilience and reliability. The tests evaluate:

    Typical daily rate accuracy between -4 and +6 secs.
    Mean variation, highest variation rates, and impacts of thermal changes.
    Why COSC Certification Is Important
    For timepiece aficionados and collectors, a COSC-certified timepiece isn’t just a item of technology but a testament to enduring quality and accuracy. It signifies a watch that:

    Offers outstanding reliability and precision.
    Offers assurance of superiority across the entire design of the watch.
    Is likely to hold its worth better, making it a sound choice.
    Well-known Timepiece Brands
    Several renowned manufacturers prioritize COSC certification for their watches, including Rolex, Omega, Breitling, and Longines, among others. Longines, for instance, offers collections like the Record and Spirit, which highlight COSC-validated movements equipped with cutting-edge materials like silicone equilibrium suspensions to improve resilience and performance.

    Historical Background and the Evolution of Timepieces
    The concept of the chronometer originates back to the need for exact timekeeping for navigation at sea, highlighted by John Harrison’s work in the 18th cent. Since the official establishment of Controle Officiel Suisse des Chronometres in 1973, the certification has become a yardstick for judging the precision of luxury timepieces, maintaining a tradition of excellence in watchmaking.

    Conclusion
    Owning a COSC-accredited watch is more than an aesthetic selection; it’s a commitment to quality and precision. For those valuing precision above all, the COSC accreditation offers tranquility of mind, ensuring that each accredited watch will operate dependably under various circumstances. Whether for individual satisfaction or as an investment decision, COSC-accredited timepieces distinguish themselves in the world of watchmaking, maintaining on a tradition of meticulous timekeeping.

  8. 레버리지스탁
    로드스탁과 레버리지 방식의 스탁: 투자의 새로운 영역

    로드스탁을 통해 제공되는 레버리지 방식의 스탁은 주식 투자의 한 방식으로, 큰 이익율을 목적으로 하는 투자자들에게 매력적인 선택입니다. 레버리지 사용을 이용하는 이 전략은 투자자가 자신의 자금을 넘어서는 자금을 투입할 수 있도록 하여, 주식 장에서 훨씬 큰 작용을 가질 수 있는 기회를 제공합니다.

    레버리지 스탁의 원리
    레버리지 스탁은 원칙적으로 투자금을 빌려 투자하는 방법입니다. 예를 들어, 100만 원의 자금으로 1,000만 원 상당의 주식을 취득할 수 있는데, 이는 투자하는 사람이 기본적인 자본보다 훨씬 훨씬 더 많은 주식을 구매하여, 주식 가격이 증가할 경우 상응하는 더 큰 수익을 획득할 수 있게 해줍니다. 하지만, 주식 값이 내려갈 경우에는 그 손해 또한 커질 수 있으므로, 레버리지를 이용할 때는 조심해야 합니다.

    투자 계획과 레버리지 사용
    레버리지는 특히 성장 가능성이 큰 사업체에 투입할 때 효과적입니다. 이러한 기업에 높은 비율을 통해 투자하면, 잘 될 경우 상당한 이익을 가져올 수 있지만, 반대의 경우 많은 리스크도 감수하게 됩니다. 그렇기 때문에, 투자자는 자신의 위험성 관리 능력과 장터 분석을 통해, 어느 회사에 얼마만큼의 투자금을 투자할지 결정해야 합니다.

    레버리지의 이점과 위험성
    레버리지 방식의 스탁은 큰 이익을 제공하지만, 그만큼 높은 위험성 수반합니다. 주식 시장의 변화는 추정이 힘들기 때문에, 레버리지 사용을 이용할 때는 언제나 시장 경향을 정밀하게 주시하고, 손실을 최소로 줄일 수 있는 전략을 구성해야 합니다.

    최종적으로: 조심스러운 고르기가 요구됩니다
    로드스탁을 통해 제공하는 레버리지 방식의 스탁은 강력한 투자 수단이며, 적절히 이용하면 상당한 이익을 제공할 수 있습니다. 하지만 큰 리스크도 신경 써야 하며, 투자 결정은 충분한 데이터와 신중한 판단 후에 이루어져야 합니다. 투자하는 사람의 재정적 상태, 위험 수용 능력, 그리고 시장 상황을 반영한 조화로운 투자 방법이 중요하며.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *