Gambling plan on state votes – some win and some lose

Five states – Missouri, Colorado, Maryland, Maine and Ohio – have gambling problems in state voting this year. Voters in the first three states passed their proposals, but the other two rejected them.

Missouri

Proposition A was a three-part bill: removing loss limits, raising game taxes, and freezing new casino licenses. By removing the $500-per-hour limit, proponents say Missouri could remain competitive with neighboring states without loss limits. Taxes only went up 1% from 20% to 21%, which is funding schools and local governments. 슬롯머신

State of Colorado

Amendment 50 to the State Constitution brings about changes that the gaming market must be very satisfied with. Casinos can increase betting limits from $5 to $100 per game, as well as add roulette and kraps to the gaming floor. Casinos are allowed to operate 24 hours a day for seven days a week. The current game tax cannot be increased without a statewide vote.

If these new surcharges increase revenues as the proponents think, towns and universities will also be pleased with the results. Taxes are distributed by giving 78% to local colleges and 22% to local governments in three towns of gaming.

the state of Maryland

Gov. Martin O’Malley has long sought to legalize slot machines in the state, and this year voters finally passed a constitutional amendment required to allow slot machines. Governor O’Malley was busy paving the way for up to 15,000 slot machines to be installed in five locations in the state by the next day. Because it will take years for the slot machine to be fully implemented, the estimated $660 million in revenue growth is not expected until 2013.

Maine

Gambling supporters could not hide their disappointment with Maine voters this year, who rejected the casino offer for the third time since 2003. Plans to spend $184 million to create a casino resort in Oxford County promising new jobs have not been able to penetrate Maine’s traditionally anti-casino residents. At the same time, a proposal to add slot machines to Scarborough Downs racetrack was also strongly rejected.

State of Ohio

Ohioans voted against a constitutional amendment that would allow a $600 million casino complex, despite promising thousands of new jobs and millions of dollars in additional tax revenue. This is the fourth proposal to legalize gambling rejected by the state since 1990.

2 thoughts on “Gambling plan on state votes – some win and some lose

  1. Wow, marvelous blog structure! How lengthy have you ever been blogging for?
    you made blogging glance easy. The total glance of your
    web site is excellent, as neatly as the
    content material! You can see similar here ecommerce

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *